The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000

Essay topics:

The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000.

The line graph illustrates the fertility rates in China and America over the course of 8 decades.
Overall, it is clear that there were some startling parallels between the two countries: lows in the 1940s and highs in the 1950s. It is also pronounced that the birth rates were close until around 1950, then the difference expanded gradually as China’s fertility declined so much many years later.
Starting with China, the birth rate rose form 10% in 1920 to 15% in 1935 before suddenly plummeting to one third of that in 1940s. Years after that, the country saw a dramatic rise, with the peak at 20% in 1950. However, in the second half of the century, the birth rate began to descend sharply.
Moving to the US, fertility ranged from about 10% to 13% until 1940, then witnessed a big fall to 5% in 1945. Five years later, the figure tripled, reaching 15% as the highest rate. The same occurrence also existed in this country: the fertility rate decreased during the rest of the century; nonetheless, it was not as deeply low as that in China.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-12-11 thaiha123 78 view
2023-08-21 bemoichoianhyeuem 89 view
2023-07-31 teulimin.06 67 view
2023-07-26 trucvy112233 73 view
2023-07-04 dhq.testbig 78 view
Essays by user nguyendangquan… :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1940s'.
Suggestion: in the 1940s
...uddenly plummeting to one third of that in 1940s. Years after that, the country saw a dr...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, nonetheless, second, so, then, third

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 867.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66129032258 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35766634376 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645161290323 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0732689116 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3333333333 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212130028871 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827436602489 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609840357933 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129896138033 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383857152867 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.