The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Presented is the line graph exhibiting the quantities of air pollutants generated from three particular sources in the UK over a 15-year course commencing 1990.
As transparent from the statistics, the total amount of atmospheric pollutants demonstrates a downward trend during the researched timescale. Also noteworthy is the fact that, industry maintained and strengthened its position as the major producer.
In 1990, the total volume of air pollutants in the UK was staggering 7 million tonnes. It dropped to 4 million tonnes in the following 9 years, the steepest plunge since the start of 1990. After that, it sustained a period of deterioration, ending at just over 3 million tonnes.
In the beggining, industry accounted for the lion's share with practically 5.5 million tonnes and then it took a nosedive in the eyar 1996 roughly 3 million tonnes. By the end of the period, industry witnessed a marginal decline and produced around 2 million tonnes harmful substances in the air.
In contrast, the rates of transport and households remained consistant at 1 million tonnes in the initial year. The data on transport experienced little change until last year while the number of households' material falling to lows not seen since 1990, trough of 0,1 million tonnes in 2005.
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think high school graduates should travel or work for a period of time instead of going directly to study at university Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both approaches 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... trend during the researched timescale. Also noteworthy is the fact that, industry m...
^^^^
Line 7, column 111, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...lly 5.5 million tonnes and then it took a nosedive in the eyar 1996 roughly 3 million tonn...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1084.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21153846154 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94029594373 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610576923077 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1358314487 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.4 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130576104078 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562243979306 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710176506327 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0818784703048 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711115617428 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.