The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.

The given graph reveals that the methods which the travellers used to request questions in a certain region from January to June in 2011. There are three means of the requestion included face-to-face service, letter or email service and telephone service.

Overall, it can be observed that people who prefer to visit office are increased every month, while letter and email users are decreased slightly. Although telephone enquiries had fluctuated, there is a great increase in its users.

To begin with, the tourists who requested by a physical meeting in January were just over 400 which is the smallest number. However, it has increased at nearly double in August and peaked at almost 190 in June which is the biggest number.

The letter and email requestion, on the other hand, were nearly 800 in January; however, it has plunged between March and May although it maintained in June. Despite the fluctuation in telephone requesters, it has consistently risen up from April to June.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-17 kingdangyeu0606 78 view
2019-12-27 Maleeha 67 view
2019-12-18 lunanguyen0701 84 view
2019-12-15 KIM JINUK 56 view
2019-12-14 rohitbangari27@gmail.com 67 view
Essays by user Jiny Ju :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, may, while, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 841.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15950920245 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62461989742 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638036809816 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.8715844445 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.125 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0993405476882 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0397868931391 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03705322629 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0540143535904 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035537124786 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.