The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007.

The given line graph illustrated the number of foreign people who visited three particular places in a European nation during a period from 1987 to 2007.

Overall, the number of visitors in three different areas had big changes throughout the period. At first, the coast was the best choice for most people. By contrast, mountains and lakes were less common than the aforementioned option.

In 1987, the figures that people chose the coast to visit was the biggest with 40 thousand visitors; while mountains and lakes were as not popular as the coast, about 20 thousand and 10 thousand visitors respectively.

Five years later, in 1992, the number of people who visited the coast took a nosedive by a few thousand, which was followed by approximately 75 thousand visitors in 2007. From 1987 to 1997, the attraction of the mountains became bigger, climbed to thousand, but later, this area had a plateau between 1992 to 2002. After that, that choice gradually rose to about 35 in 2007. There was a significant upward trend of the visitors who interested in lakes, followed by just around 75 thousand visitors in a long time from 1987 to 2002 but then, this region speedy dropped to 50 thousand in 2007.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-01-16 honguyenlily 67 view
2023-11-02 tracywu 73 view
2023-10-23 Giang Tran 61 view
2023-10-23 Giang Tran 61 view
2023-10-23 Giang Tran 67 view
Essays by user Anh1405 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 76, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...er of people who visited the coast took a nosedive by a few thousand, which was followed b...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 249, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...the mountains became bigger, climbed to thousand, but later, this area had a plateau bet...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1005.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8786407767 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55460213775 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567961165049 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0306469891 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.666666667 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234789855691 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0992189920084 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854770782372 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145136373585 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636509315528 0.0819641961636 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 76, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...er of people who visited the coast took a nosedive by a few thousand, which was followed b...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 249, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...the mountains became bigger, climbed to thousand, but later, this area had a plateau bet...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1005.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8786407767 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55460213775 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567961165049 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0306469891 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.666666667 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234789855691 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0992189920084 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854770782372 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145136373585 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636509315528 0.0819641961636 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.