The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular caribbean island between 2010 and 2017. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given line graph depicts the trends of people travelled to the caribbean tourist places during the period between 2010 and 2017, and their prefence of stay during the visit. In general, there was an increasing trend of people visiting caribbean islands has been reported during this time periods.

The number of tourists enjoyed caribbean natural beauty was 1 million in total in 2010, and this number has been soared gradually with a steady rasining pattern in every year. For an example, it became 1.5 million in 2012 with an average of 50% increase in each of the next two years. From then it inclined steadily and peaked to 2.5 million in 2014 sharing half million of addition in every year. Nonetheless, at this stage, the increasing rate was slowed down significantly until 2016, which was followed by a dramatinc turn over towars the positive trend which peaked the number to 3.5 million in 2017.
However, there was an interesting difference and fluctuation observed about the tourists pereferences of stay during their visit to the caribean peninsula. in 2010, nearly 0,25 million travellers pereferred to stay on cruise ships while rest of the people visited the islands in this year stayed in land and this number didn't increase much in the next year but the amount of people stayed in ships risedto o.5 million. Unexpectedly, this number felt to the similar situation of 2010in the next year but from then it increased steadily over the next years with slight flucatuatipn and peaked to 2 miilion in 2017. Interestingly, the while the numbers of tourist staying on cruise ships were lower in 2010, it crossed the number of people preferered to live in land after 2015. On the other hand, after a stagnat situation of people staying in land in the first year, it followed a dramatinc grwoth curve where there were rising trend reported in 2012 and 2013 and a steady state for the next two years which was followed by a sudden fall over the next year that ultimately went down under the visitors preferring cruis ship for stay intercepting at after 2015, then again wen up reaching 1.5 million in 2017.
Summing up, more and more people gradually became interested to visit caribbean places during the period. While the pereferences of tourists for staying has been changed over the years with great fulctuation for both the categories.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-04-14 soomi2209 61 view
2024-03-11 MinyiChu 67 view
2024-01-14 Ahmad_off 67 view
2024-01-14 Ahmad_off 67 view
2024-01-14 Ahmad_off 61 view
Essays by user Md Mazedul Islam :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 156, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
... their visit to the caribean peninsula. in 2010, nearly 0,25 million travellers pe...
^^
Line 4, column 320, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...his year stayed in land and this number didnt increase much in the next year but the ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, nonetheless, so, then, while, in general, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 33.7804878049 231% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1961.0 965.302439024 203% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 399.0 196.424390244 203% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91478696742 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 3.73543355544 120% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48741027564 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 106.607317073 174% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466165413534 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 566.1 283.868780488 199% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.724475132 43.030603864 197% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.846153846 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6923076923 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149997074038 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683196647809 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532703455766 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110169659431 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571089701572 0.0819641961636 70% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.79 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 40.7170731707 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.