The graph below shows the production of three forest industry products in a European country, namely timber, pulp, and paper from 1980 to 2000.
The line graph compares a nation in Europe in terms of the manufacture of three distict forestry’s products over a period of 20 years from 1980 to 2000.
It is clear from the graph that during the research period, an instable trend was witnessed in all categories. Additionally, local inhabitants were prone to exploit forests to produce paper and pulp.
In 1980, standing at approximately 6 million tonnes, the number of pulp produced was highest, while there were around 5 million of log manufactured by residents. Likewise, the figure for paper was dwarfed by that of wood, at exactly 4 million. To 1990, this country saw insignificant growths in the quantity of pulp and paper to 8 and about 7 million tonnesin turn. Meanwhile, the number of timber made underwent a steady increase to the point, at which it shared a comparable figure with that of pulp.
In 2000, the production of paper upsurged to exactly 12 million tonnes to reach the peak of the graph after having undergone a fluctuation in 1995. Conversely, there was a slow rise in the quantity of pulp to 10 million , compared to an unchanged trend witnessed in 1995. At the same time, the manufacture of log rebounded slightly to nearly 8 million tonnes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 219, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...se in the quantity of pulp to 10 million , compared to an unchanged trend witnesse...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, if, likewise, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1015.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83333333333 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82933228497 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585714285714 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.4947267671 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238281273284 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899653436241 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685451176547 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151062214827 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520102824995 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.