The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The line graph illustrates the recycling percentage of four classified materials ( paper and cardboard, glass containers, aluminium cans and plastics ) over 30 years from 1982 to 2010.
Overall, the ratio of all materials increased over the given period. From the start to the end of the period, the proportion of paper and cardboard was still the most popular material, while people least reduced plastics.
With regards to the ratio of paper reduced, it began at approximately 65% in the 1982, which fluctuate moderately and reached a peak of the four-fifths 12 years later, fell dramatically in the final years to 70%. Likewise, 50% of glass containers was reduced in the first year after which the figure decrease gradually and rose to 60% in 2010.
On the other hand, the recycling of aluminium cans only started in 1986 at about less than 10% and then reached a high peak of nearly a half in the last year. Similarly, the recycling of plastics only began in 1990 and marked a slight rise to approximately 10% in 2007.
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Many students choose to take a gap year before starting university to travel or gain work experience Do you think this is a good idea or a waste of time 73
- Many students choose to take a gap year before starting university to travel or gain work experience Do you think this is a good idea or a waste of time 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Many students choose to take a gap year before starting university to travel or gain work experience Do you think this is a good idea or a waste of time 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... percentage of four classified materials paper and cardboard, glass containers, a...
^^
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... containers, aluminium cans and plastics over 30 years from 1982 to 2010. Overa...
^^
Line 2, column 192, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'people the least'.
Suggestion: people the least
... still the most popular material, while people least reduced plastics. With regards to the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, likewise, similarly, still, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84571428571 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69048815842 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582857142857 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.840154923 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.142857143 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 5.23603664747 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124786779476 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570369345597 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537186868515 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0826913890035 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609072693512 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.