The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates the proportion of the population aged 65 and above for the USA, Sweden, and Japan over a century from 1940 to 2040.
Overall, the trend is, the proportion of the population aged 65 is increasing for all the three countries. Moreover, Japan and Sweden had followed the same level of increase till 1980 and from then on increased in populace is varied much for both countries. Japan had a very less populace aged 65 and above in 1980 compared to the other two countries and this is likely to reverse in 2040, where Japan will have more populace aged 65 and above in 2040 compared to Sweden and the USA.
To elaborate, In 1940 Japan had 5 percent of its population aged 65 and above, whereas Sweden and the USA were around 7 and 9 percent proportion of their populace aged 65 and above. While the USA and Sweden have a gradual increase in their proportion of populace aged 65 and above, Japan’s proportion of populace aged 65 and above had declined till 1960, remained constant till 1990, then started raising till 2040. During 1980 -2000 there was not much proportion change of population aged 65 and above in the USA and it was around 15% of its populace. Opposing to declining or staying constant, Sweden’s populace aged 65 and above increased thoroughly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-04 | Parth panchal0908 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 67
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve the problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 50
- The bar chart below shows US seafood imports for 1986 1996 and 2016 and the forecast for 2026 The pie chart shows the geographical structure of these imports in 2016 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 79
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports swimming boating and fishing among their favorite recreational activities The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits however and the city park department devotes little of i 60
- Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news During the same time period most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned with th 55
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 6.8 279% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6814159292 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52109899996 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.446902654867 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.1274866718 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.25 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.25 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216010410826 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128435473761 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720996281405 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193810298988 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047712660521 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.