The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
This line graph illustrates the amount of goods transported in the UK from 1974 to 2002 by various types of transportation methods. The quantity is measured in millions tonnes.
Initially in 1974, more than 70 tons of goods were transported to the UK on the road while around 40 million tons were transported via water and rail transportation. The least quantity of goods was transported in pipelines in this same year. Over the years, the quantity transported via road gradually increased with slight changes and reached around 100 million tonnes in 2002. Similarly, goods transported by water rose slowly until it reached around 52 millions tons in 1994. Afterwards it declined in 1998 and finally reached to around 62 million tons in 2002. In contrast, the amount of goods transported by rail modes fluctuated during the period to finally reach 41 million tonnes in 2002. Finally, goods carried by pipeline kept increasing over the years to reach over 20 million tons in 2002.
In general, there was a major increase in the amount of goods transported by all four types; road, water, rail, and pipeline.
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. 73
- Some people say that the Internet is responsible for destroying the social skills of teenagers and young adults 84
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 78
- Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for theirachievements, and this sets a bad example to young people. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 5, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
This line graph illustrates the amount of goo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, similarly, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 928.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01621621622 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7419315197 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524324324324 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4849219799 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347733509585 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158054651114 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0925582765311 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266308980054 0.15604864568 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0904226318481 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.