The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009
The diagram given illustrates changes in average cost of 3 different product categories: fresh fruits and vegetables, sugar and sweets and carbonated drinks, over a period of thirty-one year since 1978 in the U.S. Overall, the prices of all products rose and also the graph shows the growth in consumer-price index.
It could be seen from the graph that the category “Fresh fruits and vegetables” shows the most spectacular rise despite periodic fluctuations. In fact, fresh food prices only levelled out temporarily between 1990 and 1992 and again from 2000 to 2001. In 1979 the price stood at approximately $55 and by 2009 the price had increased by more than $300.
In contrast there were slight and steady increase in price of Sugar and sweets and Carbonated drinks. The figure stood roughly at $55 and while it rose up to $200 for Sugar and sweets in 2009, for Carbonated drinks it remained fairly constant until the same year, when the price was $150.
- The best way for the government to reduce traffic congestion is to provide free public transport 24 hours a day 7 days a week Do you agree or disagree 76
- With the recent development in the technology like e-books some people feel that the printed media like books, newspapers and magazine will soon be a thing of the past. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
- New technologies provided machines that replaced workers to do certain physical jobs and tasks Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The chart and graph below give information about sales and share prices for Coca-Cola.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 78
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e price had increased by more than 00. In contrast there were slight and steady i...
^^
Line 3, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...rice had increased by more than 00. In contrast there were slight and steady increase i...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, in contrast, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 801.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91411042945 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76816995077 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644171779141 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.3624398656 43.030603864 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.5 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1666666667 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386868909432 0.215688989381 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158634694884 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627830976312 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234688434126 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344245324669 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.