The graph show average CO2 emissions per person in the UK, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007
The chart represents averaged metric tonnes of carbon dioxide measured per person in various European countries from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, United Kingdom occupied the first place in CO2 emissions per person for all 40 years, meanwhile, Portugal stayed on the last place among given countries. Although, both countries had reversed lines: increasing one in Portugal and decreasing one in UK. As we can see, the overall carbon dioxide pollution had a spread in the range of nearly one and eleven at the beginning of the period converging to five-nine metric tonnes at the end of the period.
In 1967, the minimum of carbon dioxide emission was registered in Portugal, while the maximum was reached in United Kingdom. At the same time, Sweden and Italy had approximately four and nine metric tonnes of emissions per person, respectively. The next ten years the numbers increased in Portugal, Italy, and Sweden, however, the pattern for United Kingdom was reversed.
An upward trend had remained in Portugal and Italy: the emissions had risen over the long-term until reached a plateau in last decade of the period. Similarly, the numbers followed a downward trend in United Kingdom: the carbon footprint declined and achieved under nine metric tonnes per person in 2007. Swedish emissions reached a peak in 1977 and then dipped to nine tonnes by the end of the period.
- The table gives information about the land covered by forests in various countries in 1990 and 2005 with a forecast for 2015 78
- The diagram illustrates the process of brick production 78
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 76
- The chart shows the changes in UK citizens travel aims from 1994 to 1998 along with the bar chart providing data on their preferred routes during the same period 89
- The chart shows market shares of five industrial spheres in the national budget in 2005 and 2015 along with the predictions by 2025 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, similarly, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1147.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07522123894 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54919872273 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53982300885 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.172761268 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.7 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242608043853 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.097111941723 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681227897906 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153427595507 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336304356272 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.