The graph shows the percentage of visiting the cinema once a month or more between 1984 to 2000 (4 age groups). Summarise the information and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the share of people in each age group who went to the movies at least once a month from 1984 to 2003. Overall, all age groups showed similar trends throughout the period, starting with an initial decline over the first 10 years, followed by an increase in intensity over the next 10 years, after which most groups decline slightly again over the next 10-year period. In addition, the 14-24 year old group always goes to the movies the most, during which time it is the opposite of those aged 50 and over.
In the first year, the youngest group (14-24) has the highest-grade attainment rate, at 92%, which then gradually declines to 88% after 10 years. The next ten years saw this number increase again and reach 90% in 1998, then began to gradually decrease. Ages 25-34 Reflect this trend, starting at 80% in 1978 before falling to a low of 60% ten years later and then recovering to just under 80% at the end This.
By contrast, 60% of people aged 35-49 went to the cinema at least once a month in 1978. This figure then dropped to nearly 50% in 1988, before rising again to 70%. in 1998. A similar upward trend was found among people over 50, with figures starting at 40% and falling to the low 30% range a decade later, followed by a significant increase and end at 50%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-21 | bassmodulators123 | 78 | view |
| 2024-05-21 | bassmodulators123 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-22 | anhminhbnvn1 | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-22 | anhminhbnvn1 | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-22 | anhminhbnvn1 | 78 | view |
- The graph shows the percentage of visiting the cinema once a month or more between 1984 to 2000 4 age groups Summarise the information and make comparisons where relevant 84
- A person s personality is genetic if everyone in their family is kind they will also be kind There is nothing we can do to meaningfully change our personalities or modify our dispositions What do you think 56
- The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne Australia for the period 2000 to 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons w 78
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree 56
- Many employees can now do their work from home using modern technology However this change may only benefit workers not the employers To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...0% in 1988, before rising again to 70%. in 1998. A similar upward trend was found ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, then, at least, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1069.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49159663866 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17597168287 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.7920519817 43.030603864 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.777777778 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4444444444 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112960976252 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512154414336 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650745563546 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0769928715894 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501199555369 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 78.93 61.2550243902 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.