The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four
different attractions in Brighton.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make
comparisons where relevant.
A glance at the line graph reaveals the percentage of frequent visiting in four tourist destination in Brighton from 1980 to 2010
Overall, there was an increase in the number of people who visit Pier and Pavilion. Art Gallery and Festival, however, saw an decline in the proportion of visitors.
It can be seen from the graph that in 1980, the proportion of peole who visited Pier was the lowest, at about 10%. Despit some fluctuation, this figure rose from about 12% in 1990 and to 20% in 2010. The number of people choosing Pavilion as their tourist destination stood at approximately 23% , which was the second highest in the figure in 1980. This was followed by a period of exponential growth, with the tourists in this place reached the highest number at about 49%.
The most popular places of interest in Brighton was Festival in 1980 at 30%. And after some variation, this number ended up standing at 28% - a little lower than the number of visitors at the beginning of the graph. The figure of Art Gallery's tourist in 1980 was about 21%. Then, the later 5 years brought a considerable increase in this figure, at almost 38%. However, the number tended to slip gradually and ended at approximately 9% in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 11 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 11 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 78
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph below gives information about household car ownership in Britain from 1990 to 2030 84
- Many young people who leave school hold a negative attitude towards learning Why does this happen What are the solutions 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'destination' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'destinations'.
Suggestion: destinations
...ge of frequent visiting in four tourist destination in Brighton from 1980 to 2010 Overal...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... Art Gallery and Festival, however, saw an decline in the proportion of visitors. ...
^^
Line 5, column 295, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...t destination stood at approximately 23% , which was the second highest in the fig...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, second, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1011.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72429906542 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58075588267 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546728971963 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.2226601114 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9090909091 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4545454545 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.27272727273 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100002150693 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0417304450445 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627654289139 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0940107988492 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.082319724814 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.