Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods. Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is argued that producers and suppliers should hold accountable for limiting using packaging for their products while others feel that the responsibility lies with consumers. In this essay, I will elucidate both sides of the argument.
On the one hand, it makes sense to say that manufacturers and supermarkets should take charge of declining the use of packaging for their products. In fact, the combustion of plastic packaging releases a large volume of toxic emissions which contaminate the air and spread such respiratory diseases as asthma, lung cancer to the consumers. Therefore, manufacturers and supermarkets need to minimize the amount of plastic packaging that is used to store and sell their products, or preferably use only biodegradable, recyclable, or environmentally friendly materials. In addition, many people cannot afford to be selective about which products they buy, which is a further reason why all companies need to be responsible.
On the other hand, as far as I am concerned, the utmost solution is for buyers not to expend money on products that are packaged in non-biogradable materials. It is irrefutable that the continuation to use packaging, albeit with a small amount, harms the natural world and afflicts their own welfare. Thus, boycotting certain products and switching to the greener ones means they can enjoy better health and make a contribution to tackle environmental issues, which are always a major topic of concern. Moreover, companies will also be compelled to act more environmentally responsible by changing their attitude toward the materials that they use to package their products.
In short, although many people argue for the reduction in producing products with toxic packaging, I personally believe it is better if consumers can make other wise purchase choices
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | quynhu | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | quynhu | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | RkmsU | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-06 | viviannguyen | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 78
- The graph below gives information about household car ownership in Britain from 1990 to 2030 84
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 672, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch products they buy, which is a further reason why all companies need to be resp...
^^
Line 5, column 645, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...attitude toward the materials that they use to package their products. In short...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, in fact, in short, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40559440559 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12615571079 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.940795795 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.545454545 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27272727273 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187877652061 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730154486769 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487974933277 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121763502134 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404718170261 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.