The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh

Essay topics:

The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh

The given line graph illustrates the proportion of tourists to Scotland who visited four different destinations from 1980 to 2010.
As can be seen from the chart, there was a considerable increase in the percentage of tourists to the Zoo, while the amount of visitor who went
to Aquarium and Festival experienced a significant declined. In addition, Castle is the most popular attraction over the timescale.
In 1980, this porpotion for Festival was higher than that others, stood at 30%. This number was triple than that for Zoo, at 10%. The data of tourists to Scotland who visited to Festival declined gradually over the period, and pointed of 18% in the final year. The statistics for Zoo, by contrast, climbed substaintially, at 20% in 2010.
On the other hand, the quatity of travelers to Castle oscillated over the timeframe. This figure reached a peak of 45% in 1995 before it went down considerably in 2010. The data for Aquarium, hit a high of 35% in 1985, but then decreased steeply to under 10% at the end of the period.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-09 chipchip99 67 view
2023-08-22 beomnie_gyuu 67 view
2023-06-11 Doan Minh 78 view
2023-06-08 Nguyen051207 56 view
2023-01-16 Giang Tran 67 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The given line graph illustrates the pro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ferent destinations from 1980 to 2010. As can be seen from the chart, there was...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...popular attraction over the timescale. In 1980, this porpotion for Festival was...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...limbed substaintially, at 20% in 2010. On the other hand, the quatity of travel...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then, while, in addition, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79888268156 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78180878171 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59217877095 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.5075287449 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201109611138 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738269512928 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124037462495 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128170219356 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143709944083 0.0819641961636 175% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.