line graph discription
The line graph illustrates the recycling rates of 4 types of material (Paper and cardboard, glass containers, Aluminum cans, and plastic) of one country between 1982 and 2010.
Overall, all figures grew with different percentages over the period. The recycling rates of paper and cardboard were the highest, followed by glass containers. Aluminum cans recycling experienced a noticeable increase while plastics were not recycled so many during the time.
In 1982, about 65% of paper and cardboard were recycled, then there was a fluctuation until it reached a peak at 80% in 1990. However, from then on, the figure declined gradually to 70 in 2010. Half of glass containers were recycled in 1982, this figure dropped to 40% in 1990 but then grew steadily from 40% to 60 % by 2010.
only about 5% Aluminum cans were first recycled in 1986, however, the figure kept rising rapidly and reach a maximum of 45 % by 2010. In contrast, plastics recycling rates stayed stably but slowly, just risen from 5% at the beginning in 1990 to about 10% in 2010.
- line graph discription 11
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- More and more people are becoming seriously overweight Some people suggest that the solution to this problem is to increase the price of fattening foods To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- he diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck To what extent do you agree or not agree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Only
... steadily from 40% to 60 % by 2010. only about 5% Aluminum cans were first recyc...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94915254237 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58586207826 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581920903955 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1178385879 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3333333333 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0412053445034 0.215688989381 19% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0186850323784 0.103423049105 18% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528492524058 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0420413228514 0.15604864568 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728177071961 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.