The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant.

The line graph depicts data on how many vehicles were stolen in Great Britain, Sweden, France, and Canada from 1990 to 1999.

Overall, there saw a downward trend in France, Canada and Great Britain, except for Sweden. In addition, Great Britain which countries had the highest number of transport stolen.

Looking at the line graph, we can see that Great Britain also had a downward trend but this was higher than Sweden which had an upward trend. In 1990, the number of vehicles noticeably increased to 19 before decreasing to 16. This figure steadily rose to 20 in 1996 but fell again by 14 in 999. There was a decline moderately in the number of transport stolen in France from 1991 to 1993, falling from 7 to 6. This figure rose again to 8 before dropping to 6. Meanwhile, for the remaining time, in terms of the number of vehicles, there was a slight fluctuation between 5 and 6.

The number of cars stolen by crimes stood at only 8 in 1990 but reached 12 in 1996. This figure remained stable until 1998 before going to 14.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-06 Lee Daisy view
2023-09-03 Lee Daisy view
2023-03-07 datdatduy1 84 view
2023-03-07 datdatduy1 78 view
2022-07-22 Ngoc21 78 view
Essays by user Ngoc21 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 30, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 1999. Overall, there saw a downward trend in France, Canada and Great Britai...
^^
Line 5, column 315, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... again by 14 in 999. There was a decline moderately in the number of transport ...
^^
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in 999. There was a decline moderately in the number of transport stolen in F...
^^
Line 5, column 342, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was a decline moderately in the number of transport stolen in France from 199...
^^
Line 5, column 356, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... moderately in the number of transport stolen in France from 1991 to 1993, fal...
^^
Line 5, column 374, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e number of transport stolen in France from 1991 to 1993, falling from 7 to 6. ...
^^
Line 5, column 441, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g from 7 to 6. This figure rose again to 8 before dropping to 6. Meanwhile, for t...
^^
Line 5, column 527, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...emaining time, in terms of the number of vehicles, there was a slight fluctuation...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, look, so, while, except for, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5614973262 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30868689389 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572192513369 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9056853119 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.5454545455 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0869643497611 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.034031909117 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440264012587 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0635354100863 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519334049528 0.0819641961636 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.2329268293 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.87 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.