Some people believe that travelling within a city is better by car while some other think bicycle is a better means Discuss both sides and give your opinion

Presently, some people are of opinion that it is an optimum approach to commute by cars in mega cities. By contrast, other assert that transportation mode of bicycle entering the city brings riders numerous benefits. This essay intends to analyse both perspectives before forming any opinion.

There are umpteen reasons to endorse former viewpoint. First and foremost, the trend of using cars allows travelers to save a great deal of time along with having comfortable journeys. For example, people having cars do not need to make efforts as they do for cycling. Similarly, cars have an air conditioner and visual music options for amusement, which makes their journey more comfortable and enjoyable. Besides this, people can reach at destination within expected time, if they have cars of fast speed comparatively with bicycles. In this way, cars save and offer people precious time and comfort. Consequently, it is advisable to travel within cities by cars.

There are multifarious reasons to shore up latter view. To emark with, unlike cars, people riding bicycles do not need to wait in traffic james. To demonstrate it, typically in cities, roads are often flooded with number of traffic, which cause congestion. Despite having more congestion on the road, people can easily ride a cycle because it required less space to ride. What is more, using a bicycle is eco-friendly approach. To cite an example, bicycles have no emission of perilous gases which surely preserve atmosphere from being degraded. As a result, habits of riding bicycles would maintain the beauty of a city.

To recapitulate, as per my above discussion, it is apparent that although bicycles have nature advantages, still cars are believed to be popular mode of transportation in terms of providing and saving safety and time.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, if, similarly, so, still, for example, as a result, what is more

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20205479452 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75943892668 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643835616438 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3495337008 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.3888888889 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2222222222 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187120763368 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573341676892 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469411933452 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114353198145 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599095871298 0.056905535591 105% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.