The maps show the village of Pebbleton 20 years ago and now.
The two given maps illustrate the modernization process of a coastal village named Pebbleton during the past 20 years. Overall, there have been some recently built facilities for the villagers during this period. What is more, some buildings' functions were also changed to suit the needs of the community here.
It is clear that the number of houses along the north coast of the village increased from 4 to 7 buildings, to the left of which is now the new Community Center. In addition, a brand-new tennis court was constructed on the left side of the Lighthouse Lane, leading to the Community House. Last but not least, a footbridge was set up to facilitate the traveling between the playing field and the school.
As can also be seen from the diagrams, many buildings have changed their functions to serve the community better. To begin with, The old fort next to the lighthouse was converted into a playground for children. Moreover, next to the playing field is an apartment block, which was formerly used as a film studio.
- Task 1 The pie chart shows the online sales for retail sectors in Canada in the year 2005 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- In recent year sports stars have become increasingly famous and wealthy For some this is a benefit raising the profile of sports but for others it is a negative influence Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Attendance at cultural events in Great Britain 96
- To some people studying the past has little value in the modern world Why do you think it is important to do so What will the effect if children are not taught history 56
- Too much emphasis is placed on testing these days The need to prepare for tests and examinations is a restriction on teachers and also exerts unnecessary pressure on young learners How far do you agree or disagree with this view 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, moreover, so, as for, in addition, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81920903955 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6389926666 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638418079096 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.0333056018 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.7777777778 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113712569098 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0434506408998 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076238834857 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0721890348501 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672751143987 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.