The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
It is often suggested that science should be dedicated to enhancing the living experience of individuals. I disagree with this statement because people are not the only inhabitants of the Earth and the good of the natural environments should also be addressed by scientific research. Furthermore, studying the factors that could benefit the environment may result in future enhancements of human lives as well, serving both purposes.
To elaborate, it may be argued that the preservation of wildlife and ecosystems ought to be prioritized by empirical research because long-term access to natural resources may be more vital than short-term increases in people’s quality of life. Specifically, excessive research into enhancing individuals’ experiences throughout their daily life may lead to negative outcomes for the nature. For example, studying land cultivation contributes to life quality by speeding up food production for the population. However, this result may be achieved through over-cultivation and deforestation, which ultimately could endanger the planet.
Additionally, if scientific resources were to be directed toward green causes, it could lead to long-term life improvements, fulfilling both human-centered and nature-centered purposes. Precisely, allocating sufficient funds toward discovering sustainable ways of nature-human co-existence may not contribute to short-term convenience of individuals, but it could ensure the maintenance of the planet and pleasant experiences for future generations. For instance, while spending research budget on green energies instead of artificial intelligence could postpone the availability of virtual assistants, it might allow for a cleaner and less polluted air for the future.
In conclusion, I am against the notion that the priority of scientific inquiry should be people and their life quality, because focusing on the environment, taking care of other inhabitants of the Earth, and looking into the future may prove to be more worthwhile contributions.
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people why might this be the case do you think it is a positive or negative situation 61
- Some children spend hours every day on smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- The table and charts detailed below give information about the police budget in 2017 and 2018 in on area of Britain The table illustrates where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed 73
- The graph gives information about the percentage of the population if four different Asian countries living in cities between 1970 and 2020 with additional predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature 78
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 90, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'peopled'?
Suggestion: peopled
...riority of scientific inquiry should be people and their life quality, because focusin...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 1.00243902439 1696% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 3.97073170732 403% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 965.302439024 181% => OK
No of words: 293.0 196.424390244 149% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.94880546075 4.92477711251 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41354943875 2.65546596893 129% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 106.607317073 163% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59385665529 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 283.868780488 191% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.45097560976 131% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0216545498 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.454545455 112.824112599 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6363636364 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.54545454545 5.23603664747 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144548046897 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656555404538 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493261751991 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0977957801095 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504935613759 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 13.2329268293 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.71 61.2550243902 32% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 10.3012195122 165% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.53 11.4140731707 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.06136585366 131% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 40.7170731707 255% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.