The paragraph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The provided graph demonstrates the intake of fish and other kind of meat in a European country over the period of 1979 to 2004. Overall, there is noticeable decrease in consumption of several kinds of meat per person per week, whereas intake of chicken shows gradual increase. The unit is measured in grams per person per week.
As per the provided figures, the fish was the least consumed over the quarter of the century among the other meat variety. Fish started at 60 grams per person per week in 1979 and slowly decreased to less than 50 grams by 2004. Lamb and beef showed similar pattern of consumption which was about 150 grams and 210 grams in 1979 respectively and gradually decreased to 70 grams and 120 grams per week per person in 2004 respectively. Though, in 1979 beef was most consumed meat in 1979 and showed a fluctuation, ending up by decline in 2004.
On the other hand, chicken has shown significant hike. The intake was 140 grams per person per week in 1979 which swelled to about 240 grams per person in 2004. Over the observed period, it showed hike of 100 grams.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | mary.ssherr | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | manhstorm | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | manhstorm | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | happyhappy | 61 | view |
- The charts show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. 67
- the chart below shows information on the percentage of british people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. 61
- The paragraph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 56
- Digital communication technology, such as email, instant messaging and social media, has improved communication and cinnections between people.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opipnion.Give reasons for your answer and include examples fro 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, whereas, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63076923077 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37919980581 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487179487179 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.4229017127 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210016350863 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106120100042 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0964516556886 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164692198427 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744967712094 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.