Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010.
The change in British eating fruit and vegetable as daily recommended consumption in three different people from 2002 to 2010 is displayed in the bar chart, shown in percentage.
Overall, the most popular trend to consume the aforementioned typical meals was observed on women. Additionally, all figures experienced a slight increase, with fluctuation.
Initially, there were about a quarter of females eating fruit and vegetable, being the highest proportion. Furthermore, males consuming those accounted for approximately a fifth, being larger than children at a half of the latter, being the smallest. Eventually, the figure for the former increased moderately, with a gap of one percent, followed by that for men which was lower at almost a fourth, and that for kids was below a twentieth.
By 2006, the whole rates had peaked, with the vast majority of women ate these meals to reach almost a third. When it came to the counterpart sex, the proportion of men inclined to be as virtually similar as that of females in two years ago. This contrasted to the two other persons, although that of the children grew, it was still the lowest at under one in twenty.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-01 | mnaufaln | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-27 | TranMinhDuc | view | |
| 2021-10-08 | Muhammad Hassam Saeed | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-08 | Muhammad Hassam Saeed | 56 | view |
| 2021-09-19 | anna103 | 67 | view |
- The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015 84
- Buying things on the Internet such as books air tickets and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The table below shows the sales at a small restaurant in a downtown business district 78
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, still, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02577319588 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88146174127 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649484536082 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8492343647 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.333333333 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133751686966 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0500159081631 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0872798753663 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0946906055755 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113444008257 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.