The pie charts below compare the proportion of energy capacity in gigawatts (GW) in 2015 with the predictions for 2040.
The pie chart demonstrates the percentage of energy capacity from five resources including fossil fuels, wind, nuclear, solar and other renewable in 2015 and an estimation of 2040. The unit is measured by gigawatts (GW).
Overall, there is a decrease in the data of energy production in 3 sectors for fossil fuel, nuclear and other renewable while a rise is seen in the others resources. The significant drop is witnessed in the data of fossil fuels and it accounts for the largest proportion.
In 2015, the percentage for fossil fuels in power generation started at 64%, after which it is expected to drop to 44% in 2040. Similar changes, but to lesser extent, 23% of energy generated from other renewable in the first year, and a prediction to a decline to 21 % at the end of the period. Similarly, the figure for nuclear is likely to by 1% ,from 6% to 5% by 2040.
In an opposite way, solar energy stood at 2% at the beginning of the period, followed by a projection of a remarkable growth to 18%. The percentage of wind power was at 5%, before being anticipated to reach 12% by 2040. The total proportion of energy capacity also increase from 6688 GW to 11678 GW.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-30 | lee giang | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | accclone | 11 | view |
| 2023-06-14 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-07 | Andrew Chen | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-25 | anhduong | 73 | view |
- The pie charts indicate changes in the proportions of energy produced in a country from 1983 to 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- All children should be made to wear school uniform To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- As computers are being used more and more in education there will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The pie charts below compare the proportion of energy capacity in gigawatts GW in 2015 with the predictions for 2040 61
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasingly the number of sport facilities Other however say that this would have little effect on public health Discuss both of view and give your own opinions 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... The unit is measured by gigawatts GW. Overall, there is a decrease in the data...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 348, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...he figure for nuclear is likely to by 1% ,from 6% to 5% by 2040. In an opposi...
^^
Line 6, column 354, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ure for nuclear is likely to by 1% ,from 6% to 5% by 2040. In an opposite way...
^^
Line 6, column 364, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...clear is likely to by 1% ,from 6% to 5% by 2040. In an opposite way, solar en...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "In an opposite way" with adverb for "opposite"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...y to by 1% ,from 6% to 5% by 2040. In an opposite way, solar energy stood at 2% at the beginn...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 967.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62679425837 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68522876395 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0981859037 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278509719737 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109565073879 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06930130548 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166636116452 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736419505326 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... The unit is measured by gigawatts GW. Overall, there is a decrease in the data...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 348, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...he figure for nuclear is likely to by 1% ,from 6% to 5% by 2040. In an opposi...
^^
Line 6, column 354, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ure for nuclear is likely to by 1% ,from 6% to 5% by 2040. In an opposite way...
^^
Line 6, column 364, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...clear is likely to by 1% ,from 6% to 5% by 2040. In an opposite way, solar en...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "In an opposite way" with adverb for "opposite"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...y to by 1% ,from 6% to 5% by 2040. In an opposite way, solar energy stood at 2% at the beginn...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 967.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62679425837 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68522876395 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0981859037 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278509719737 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109565073879 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06930130548 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166636116452 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736419505326 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.