The pie charts below show the comparision of different kinds of energy production in France in two years.
The pie chart gives information about the change in the different kinds of fossil fuel which were created in France in 1995 and 2005.
Overall, it can be seen that there were 2 opposite trends for these 5 figures. While the rate of gas, coal, nuclear and other production witnessed a progress, the number of petrol kinds of energy-reduced slightly.
Looking at the for more details, it can be seen that in 1995, the majority of gas accounted for the largest number of manufacture, at 29,63%. while, the proportion of coal and petrol had the lower figures, at 29,27% and 29,80% respectively. Regarding to nuclear, it was produced with 6,40% and turning to the last figure, the number of other kinds of creation made up the lowest percentage in 1995, about 4,90%.
After 10 years, the kinds of energy resources had the noticeable change. The number of gas took up 30,31%, which produced slightly lower than coal, around 30,93%. the rate of nuclear and other kinds of production had a minimally improved, at 10,10% and 9,10% respectively. By contrast, petrol creation declined considerably from 29,27% to 19,55% in 2005.
According to the current prediction, subway will still be the dominant means of transport used by british passengers in this metropolitan area . it is likely to continue increasing even more stronger than now or in the past. Moreover passengers are expected to prefer using tram and tend to put this transportation form in use more and more until 2030. There are also a climb in the number of commuters traveling by bike but it is insignificant. In contrast, estimations reveal that bus will lose its popularity among of all the upward trend .
Unlike those two countries, the production of co2 emissions in Greece had a remarkable growth to touch the highest point at around 6 metric tons in 2015. Likewise, Spain kept releasing the gas until its co2 emissions increased to nearly 8 at the end of the period.
- The chart below shows the average cost of monthly contract for four different mobile cell phones in a European country from January to September 2002 measured in euro Given is the line chart illustrating the average monthly spending on four cell phones in 67
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 73
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant. 11
- The graph below shows percentage of workers in five European countries taking fixed stays or more sickness absence per year from 1991 to 2001 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...rgest number of manufacture, at 29,63%. while, the proportion of coal and petrol had ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 163, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...lightly lower than coal, around 30,93%. the rate of nuclear and other kinds of prod...
^^^
Line 8, column 143, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ish passengers in this metropolitan area . it is likely to continue increasing ev...
^^
Line 8, column 146, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... passengers in this metropolitan area . it is likely to continue increasing even ...
^^
Line 8, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...engers in this metropolitan area . it is likely to continue increasing even more ...
^^
Line 8, column 188, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'stronger' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: stronger
... is likely to continue increasing even more stronger than now or in the past. Moreover passe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 227, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
... more stronger than now or in the past. Moreover passengers are expected to prefer usin...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... or in the past. Moreover passengers are expected to prefer using tram and tend t...
^^
Line 8, column 485, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt. In contrast, estimations reveal that bus will lose its popularity among of al...
^^
Line 8, column 545, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...popularity among of all the upward trend . Unlike those two countries, the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, likewise, look, moreover, regarding, so, still, while, as to, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 33.7804878049 189% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1622.0 965.302439024 168% => OK
No of words: 328.0 196.424390244 167% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94512195122 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 3.73543355544 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76037819636 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 106.607317073 175% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57012195122 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 283.868780488 165% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 8.94146341463 190% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.8646765125 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4117647059 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2941176471 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17647058824 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12522943316 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373883956949 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619445400018 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0775789444796 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728529206409 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 40.7170731707 192% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.