The pie charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The charts are given below reveal information about the consumption of water for various purposes such as industrial use, agricultural use and domestic use in six areas of the world. It is evident that Africa and Asia consumed water for agricultural use more than other areas.

In these 6 areas, the percentages of domestic use were under 20%. In addition, central Asia and South East Asia had the same percentage of water usage in domestic use by reaching 7% and also Africa consumed water for domestic use just over it by 9%. These 3 areas had also a similar percentage in agricultural use. South East Asia, Africa and central Asia consumed water 81%, 84% and 88% respectively in agriculture. However, the consumption of water in North America and Europe was different. Most of the consumption of water belongs to industrial use by reaching 48% and 53% in North America and Europe respectively. In Europe 15% of water used for domestic use which is 2% more than that in North America and 32% of water used for agriculture which is 7% less than that in North America. The consumption of water in South America was almost similar to Africa and Asia and most of the consumption of water belongs to agriculture by 71%.

Overall, it is evident that the consumption of water in North and South America was totally different. The consumption of water in North America is almost similar to Europe and in South America is similar to Arica, central Asia and South East Asia.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, as to, in addition, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1218.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 255.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77647058824 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67920925747 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.372549019608 0.547539520022 68% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 405.9 283.868780488 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1118715118 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193527767768 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958126075356 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825413950374 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162212315746 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109335595481 0.0819641961636 133% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.91 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.