In some countries, owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people. Why might this be the case? Do you think this is a positive or negative situation?
The preference to be a homeowner has become more predominant compared to renting one in certain nations. In this essay, I would delve into some reasons that lead to this circumstance, including a sense of belonging and independence. Additionally, while there are certain perceived drawbacks, this issue benefits not only the homeowners but also a society as the whole.
First and foremost, a sense of independence is more likely to be fostered, given by the fact that all rights and responsibilities are in the hands of the homeowners which an individual renting a house does not acquire. While the desire to redecorate the interior of the house or to reconstruct the function is according to the navigation of the owner of properties, it seems easier for individuals owning their house to deliberately renovate the house only regarding their personal preferences. Furthermore, along with the sense of liberty, responsibilities on their own houses and the connection between owners and their properties are also enhanced strongly as they highly value their efforts and spirituality invested in.
While owning a house necessitates a large amount of money to invest in at first, it contains potential benefits for the long run, such as a house serving as the long-term financial insurance regardless of the fluctuation of monetary value. From the broader view of a society, due to the good maintenance of homeowners, the phenomena of gradual home deterioration or wasted buildings are mitigated significantly.
In conclusion, while renting a house is suitable for low-income families, the allure of owning personal properties seems to achieve more preference among citizens due to their sense of independence and interconnection and its significant positive outcomes such as financial insurance for owners and alleviating the burden of dead buildings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-01 | mary.ssherr | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-11 | steveminh | 73 | view |
| 2021-03-15 | sattar_iust | 78 | view |
| 2020-11-14 | Zulvah | 78 | view |
| 2020-08-28 | bilalahmedch89@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 67
- The availability of entertainment such as playing electronic games on portable devices will be harmful to individuals in the society they live in To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 78
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Some people think that governments should spend money for faster public transportation others think that there are other important priorities eg cost environment Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, regarding, so, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1565.0 965.302439024 162% => OK
No of words: 290.0 196.424390244 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39655172414 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27452059648 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 106.607317073 153% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562068965517 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 283.868780488 179% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.5423673568 43.030603864 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 173.888888889 112.824112599 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.2222222222 22.9334400587 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77777777778 5.23603664747 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136142611452 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606949138348 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384421232427 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0866253538864 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493377853123 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.1 13.2329268293 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.08 61.2550243902 36% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 10.3012195122 176% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.06136585366 125% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 40.7170731707 219% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.