The table and charts below give information on the police budget .
The table and charts illustrates police budget in two years (2017 and 2018). The table shows the money given to police in pounds. While, the charts represent how the money was distributed in the two years.
Overall, it was obvious that the most of the income was from the national government. The money was majorily distributed on salaries. Despite that the income increased in 2018 than in 2017, the money spent on salaries decreased in 2018 than in 2017.
In the table, the income from the national government which had the largest sector in providing police with money had increased from 175.5m£ to 177.8m£. Local taxes also had a jump from 91.2m£ to 102.3m£. However, other sources increased only by half million pounds.
In the charts, salaries were the largest sector. In contrast, they lowered from 75% to 69%. Spending money on building and transport kept constant. Moreover, the money spent on technology had shown a rise from 8% to 14%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ws the money given to police in pounds. While, the charts represent how the money was...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, moreover, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 797.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95031055901 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44125454963 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546583850932 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4154663242 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 61.3076923077 112.824112599 54% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.3846153846 22.9334400587 54% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113336536803 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487878110975 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0982694538239 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0821667377441 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126854062554 0.0819641961636 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 13.2329268293 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.22 61.2550243902 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.54 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.