The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002
The table compares the percentage of money that inhabitants in five countries spent on different items in 2002.
Overall, expenditure on Food/Drinks/Tobacco was by far higher than others, while leisure/Education was spent the least in 2002.
As can be seen from the table, 32.14% of the total budget in Turkey was spent on Food/Drinks/Tobacco, whereas that of Ireland was slightly lower, at 28.91%, and the figures for other surveyed countries were between 15% and 19%. It is clear that Clothing/Footwear was spent the most by the Italian, at 9%, compared to the smallest proportion was seen in Sweden (5.40%), expenditure on these items in Ireland, Spain, and Turkey was relatively approximate, with 6.43%, 6.51%, and 6.63%, respectively.
Turning to leisure/education, spending on this category in all surveyed nations was significantly low. The highest percentage was 4.35% in Turkey and Spain experienced the lowest proportion, at a mere 1.98%, while the other figures were from 2% to 3.5%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-30 | Ahmad_off | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | .zin@ | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | MiaMia_8786 | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-18 | minthu vũ | view | |
| 2023-04-13 | anhminhbnvn1 | 84 | view |
- Some people think that mental strength is the most important factor for success in sports However some others believe that it is more important to have strong and fit people Discuss both views and give your opinions 84
- The chart below shows the amount of time that 10 to 15 year olds spend chatting on the Internet and playing on games consoles on an average school day in the UK 73
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 84
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 838.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27044025157 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.46627048151 2.65546596893 131% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59748427673 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6019931135 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.666666667 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113186105748 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873710343729 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142294427699 0.0843802449381 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122267745962 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.162891912882 0.0819641961636 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.