The table below shows information about age, average income per person and population below poverty line in three states in USA.
The given table illustrates the age of the population, average income, and percentage of those living below the poverty line in three states of the United States.
Overall, it is clear that Utah has the smallest percentage of people over age 60 and the largest percentage of people under age 18 of all three states. Besides, California has a percentage of citizens living in poverty, but the personal income in this country is the highest of the three states.
Looking at the table, the proportion of residents aged under 18 in Utah is the highest point in the three states, in comparison with the other two states, only 16% and 17% respectively. However, in Utah, the number of people aged over 60 is the lowest, at around 8%, while this figure is very high in California and Florida, at about 13% and 23%.
The average income of people in California is $23,000, whereas the average for those living in Florida is only $22,000. And in Utah, this figure is only $17,000. Meanwhile, 16% of the poverty population in Califonia and only 12% of Utah, and 12% of Florida.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-05 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-09 | Kimm2903 | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-30 | Giang Tran | 61 | view |
| 2022-12-30 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2022-12-30 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- Tasks 2 As major cities in the world are growing today so do their problems What are the problems for young people who are living in the cities as the result of continued growth What are the solutions for these problems 56
- The charts below show the proportion of people s spending on different commodities and services in a particular European country in 1998 and in 2008 78
- Unhealthy eating has a negative effect on both individuals and the society in which they live Some people think that the government should tax unhealthy foods while others believe that a fat tax is unfair and unnecessary Discuss both these views and give 78
- The diagram below shows a small local museum and its surroundings in 1957 and 2007 67
- The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne Australia for the period 2000 to 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons w 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, look, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65957446809 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50736804686 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468085106383 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6999713959 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221763412024 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0990958947105 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.096883668465 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15442131026 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109914760981 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.