The table below shows the numbers of visitors to AShdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking vistors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the samw two periods.
The table compares the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum in two periods - before and after the refurbishment. Two charts illustrate the response of visitors to their satisfaction during their visit in the two mentioned periods.
Generally, there were significant improvements in the number of visitors and their satisfaction.
During post-refurbishment, the number of visitors who came to the museum escalated from 74,000 to 92,000 people.
In terms of visitors' satisfaction, during the year before the modernization, most visitors were dissatisfied which took up to 40%, while the figure of which after the modernization was only 15%. As a result of renewing, the proportion of visitors who responded "dissatisfied" halved to 5%
On the other hand, people seemed to be very satisfied with the changes of the museum, the percentage of which increased over 2 times from 15% to 35%. Also, there was a climb up in the number of visitors who rated their experience as "satisfied" by 10% when compared to the pre-refurbished era. On the contrary, the percentage of no-response visitors remained unchanged throughout the two periods.
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 56
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summerize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 73
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to AShdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking vistors how satisfied they were with their visit during the samw two periods 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48044692737 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.70739584488 2.65546596893 140% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553072625698 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8507473427 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.625 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350295070732 0.215688989381 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157466631492 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802494918225 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189401340258 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.093715704857 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.