The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.
The charts illustrate how many people visited Ashdown Museum in two periods of time, before and after its redecoration, as well as the result of the questionnaires on the satisfaction level of the visitors during those periods.
As can be seen from the charts, the number of museum-goers increased after the refurbishment of the museum, accompanied by a positive trend in the level of satisfaction among the surveyed people.
In particular, before the Ashdown Museum was refurbished, there were 74,000 visitors choosing this site as their destination. In the second surveyed period, the figure grew into 92,000 people.
Furthermore, the number of people satisfied with the place increased markedly. At the beginning, when the site was not redecorated, a massive 40% of the visitors felt discontented with the museum, followed by only under a third of them satisfied. However, after the refurbishment, the satisfaction level increased to 40%, which accounted for the biggest part of the pie. The figure for “very satisfied” also rose by 20%, at 35%. Meanwhile, the figures for “dissatisfied” and “very dissatisfied” both decreased, 15% for the former and from 10% to 5% for the latter. “No response” section remained the same, at a tiny 5%.
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period 90
- The plans
- The plans show the park in 1920 and today
- The picture below shows how a hot balloon works 73
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, second, so, third, well, while, in particular, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1067.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.335 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23338444977 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.07073170732 560% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2726398883 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.7 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282013487286 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0967370347115 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895193927204 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176470529213 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0814485590773 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.