The table below shows the salaries of secondary high school teachers in 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant

Essay topics:

The table below shows the salaries of secondary/high school teachers in 2009. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.

The table delineates the income of teachers in secondary and high school from 5 distinct nations namely Australia, Denmark, Luxembourg, Japan, and Korea in 2009.
The initial impression from this table is that teachers in Luxembourg had the highest salary as opposed to the 4 remaining nations. It I also worth highlighting that Japanese teachers took the longest time to reach the highest salary. -> thay thế bằng “the amount of time it took for Japanese teachers to earn the maximum salary was much slower than most other country”
According to the income of Luxembourg’s teachers, ranked first in the starting period (80000) and soar to 119000 when the teachers had sacrificed 15 years for work The amount of salary paid to teachers in Australia was 28000 lower than that of Korea (30000); however, after 15 years both countries saw an increase and reach the same data of salary which is 48000 and still under that of Luxembourg.
As can be seen from the table is that in Denmark teachers needed 8 years which Is the shortest time compared to other countries to approach the maximum salary (54000). In terms of Japan, the time gap that teachers in here can reach the highest salary was 37 higher than that of Luxembourg but the maximum salary of the former was 46000 lower than the latter.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-30 minhnhat2002 73 view
2023-07-30 TLan168 73 view
2023-07-30 TLan168 view
2023-07-30 TLan168 73 view
2023-07-03 nguyendangquang.aspect 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...000 and still under that of Luxembourg. As can be seen from the table is that in D...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, still

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1078.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83408071749 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44843179194 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52466367713 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 22.4926829268 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 148.037626598 43.030603864 344% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 179.666666667 112.824112599 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.1666666667 22.9334400587 162% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159473284397 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964914172965 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518931046625 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116873376224 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514488403056 0.0819641961636 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 13.2329268293 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 61.2550243902 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.9970731707 153% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.0658536585 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.