The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne.
The table below gives information about the units of fast food consumed trends in Melbourne from 2005 to the future.
In general, it can be seen that hamburgers are the most consumed fast food, while fried rice and noodles accounted for the lowest figure on the chart. It is predicted that the amount of fast food eaten in Melbourne has increased.
In 2005, the units of hamburger consumption in Melbourne was the highest and five units more than fried chicken. Both hamburgers and fried chicken have the same patterns, at nearly 37 units at present. 13 units of hamburger consumption is more in 2015 than in 2023. The number of people eating fried chicken in 2015 will increase by eight units, with 45 units.
Salad, fried rice, and noodles were similar to the amount of fast food consumption in 2005, at six units. The consumption of salad at present is triple as much as in 2005 and will continue increasing significantly in 41 units in the future. It can be seen that during this period, the units of eating fried rice and noodles are between 6 to 9.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-27 | LauraTing | 78 | view |
| 2024-09-06 | bassmodulators123 | 67 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | bassmodulators123 | 78 | view |
| 2024-07-22 | thaotanya | 84 | view |
| 2024-07-14 | dorae | 73 | view |
- 12 9 2015 Fewer and fewer people walk on a daiy basis What are the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time walking 78
- 2 7 2022 Nowadays people depend on technology in their free time Is this a positive or negative development 78
- The diagram below shows how electricty is generated in a hydroelectronic power station 61
- Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- 28 5 2016 Nowadays young people admire sports stars though they often do not set a good example Do you think this is a positive or negative development 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63829787234 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45304478165 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515957446809 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.3753974327 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.2 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.1 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210047471887 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105130639369 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137565150711 0.0843802449381 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187794297601 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145716122547 0.0819641961636 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.