The table shows the change in the number of cinemas in different regions in a European country between 2004 and 2009.
The given table illustrates the differences and changes in the number of cinemas in different areas in a European country over a 5-year period from 2004 to 2009. Overall, what stands out from the graph is that there were upward trends in City Center, Nearby City Center and in total, except for Suburb and Countryside that bucked the trend. Noticeably, the most remarkable change could be found in Suburb area.
In particular, when it comes to City Center, the graph witnessed a growth of 3,1% from 1512 in 2004 to 1620 in 2009 in the number of cinemas, which constantly accounted for the highest numbers. Similarly, regarding Near City Center, the figure stood at 300 in 2004, then slightly increased by 1,6% to 400 in 2009, which were one-fifth and one-fourth respectively in comparison with those in City Center.
In stark contrast, concerning Suburb and Countryside, it demonstrates the opposite trend, with numbers decreasing by 25% from 40 to 30 for the former and by 6% from 108 to 90 for the latter. Meanwhile, in terms of total number, a slight rise of 2% from 2100 to 2287 cinemas was experienced in the figure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-19 | maiphuong0610 | 89 | view |
| 2021-08-19 | maiphuong0610 | 74 | view |
| 2021-08-19 | maiphuong0610 | 89 | view |
- The chart below shows the movement of people from rural to urban areas in three countries and predictions for future years 73
- The graph shows the proportions of unemployment and the number of citizens leaving Ireland between 1988 and 2008 84
- In many countries traditional foods are being replaced by international fast foods This is having a negative effect on both families and societies To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country Do the advantages outweigh this advantage 84
- The chart below gives information about the high speed continuous Internet connection of households in five countries in 2001 and 2002 74
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, similarly, so, then, while, except for, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 932.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80412371134 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67483559429 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618556701031 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.5955240033 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.142857143 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7142857143 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 5.23603664747 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223185340349 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119712310379 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.16233575574 0.0843802449381 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14659049012 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0891861694482 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.