The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The tables provide information on the sales of coffee and bananas which are labelled as Fairtrade in five European countries over a period of five years. It can be clearly seen that the total amount of sales in these countries significantly increased.

Firstly, overall, the sales of coffee rose in each country. In 1999, the largest sales of coffee was in Switzerland with 3 million of euros. However, after enormous growth from 1.5 million to 20 million, UK had the highest sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee in 2004, while Switzerland only had 6 million sales at the same time. Furthermore, there were slight increases in the sales in Denmark, Belgium, and Sweden, with 0.2 million, 0.7 million, and 0.2 million respectively.

Secondly, the total amount of Fairtrade-labelled bananas sales in these five countries tripled over five-year period, although there was a small drop in Sweden and Denmark sales. In 1999, the highest sales was in Switzerland with 15 million sales and this domination still remain the same until 2004 with the sales of 47 million. On the other hand, the figures in UK and Belgium rose approximately 4.5 million and 3.4 million respectively in this period.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-18 Noah1997 67 view
2020-01-18 Noah1997 67 view
2019-08-26 farlotfi 56 view
2019-08-22 Heri 73 view
2019-01-07 Hailie 56 view
Essays by user Heri :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, still, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 998.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11794871795 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94925747572 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54358974359 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2609880614 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.888888889 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1111111111 5.23603664747 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206318123676 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104554088283 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0969438696125 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170690037283 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644956739182 0.0819641961636 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.