The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh.
The line graph compares the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited Edinburgh atractions between 1980 and 2010.
In general terms, there was a fluctuation in the percentage of tourists in four different places. Besides, we can see that in 1980 and in 2010, the favourite attraction were the castle and the festical. In 1980, the least popular place was the zoon while in 2010 this changed and the aquarium was the least popular.
It is clear from the line graph show that during the 1980s and 1995s, there was a significant increase in visitors to the castle from about 23% to nearly 45% and the proportion dropped gradually to 30% in 2010. The trend for the aquarium was similar to the castle. Visitors rose dramatically from 20% to arround 35% between 1980 and 1985 and then gradually decreased to under 10% over th next twenty-five years.
On the other hand, ther proportion of tourists who visited the festival fluctuated slightly but in general remained stable at about 25% from 1980 to 2010. Visitors to the zoo also fluctuated between 1980 ans 2000 and then rose sharply from 10% to 20% from 2000 to 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-09 | chipchip99 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-22 | beomnie_gyuu | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-11 | Doan Minh | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-08 | Nguyen051207 | 56 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows the total number of Olympic medals won by twelve different countries. 73
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children). To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The chart below shows information about the problems people have when they go to live in other countries 71
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? 61
- Social media such as Facebook, Twitter is replacing facr-to-face contact in people's lives. DO you think the advatages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 55
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, then, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 928.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75897435897 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48543951826 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1270239473 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.111111111 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213935695205 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102328411989 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141760761211 0.0843802449381 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17121743802 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.161091782774 0.0819641961636 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.