The three pie charts show different accommodation choices by holidaymakers in the three
years 1965, 1985 and 2005.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making
relevant comparisons.
The pie charts depict how people chose where to stay when they went on vacation in 1965, 1985, and 2005.
In general, the choice of staying at hotels and caravans increased while the choice of staying with friends or relatives and camping decreased. In addition, staying with friends or relatives and staying at hotels are the two most popular choices over the years given, except in 1965, when the most popular choice just belonged to the former.
In 1965, most people chose to stay with friends or relatives, 55%. This figure then declined sharply in the next two years, falling to 35% and 30%, respectively. Camping accounted for a third of the remaining choices in the first year of the survey, at 15%. After that, it saw a slight rise to 18% in 1985 before dropping to 12% in 2005.
In contrast, in the first year given, only 16% of people chose to stay at hotels; however, this choice had a substantial growth to 37% in 1985 and 38% in 2005. In 1985, the least common choice was caravans, which represented only 10% of the total pie chart, and this was a drop from 14% in 1965. In 2005, this figure doubled from 1985’s figure.
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wh 69
- The pie chart shows the sources of electricity in the four countries from 2003 to 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant
- The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 73
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledg 56
- More and more people are seriously overweight Some people suggest the solution to this problem is to increase the price of fattening foods To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 255, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'years'' or 'year's'?
Suggestion: years'; year's
...e the two most popular choices over the years given, except in 1965, when the most po...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ar choice just belonged to the former. In 1965, most people chose to stay with fr...
^^
Line 4, column 296, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
..., and this was a drop from 14% in 1965. In 2005, this figure doubled from 1985’s f...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, then, third, while, in addition, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56097560976 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26441315233 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526829268293 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1851826441 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173743155461 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764824249709 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418522670684 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11944855082 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380029240893 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.