The three pie charts show different accommodation choices by holidaymakers in the three years 1965 1985 and 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making relevant comparisons

Essay topics:

The three pie charts show different accommodation choices by holidaymakers in the three
years 1965, 1985 and 2005.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making
relevant comparisons.

The pie charts show how people chose where to stay on vacation in 1965, 1985, and 2005.
As a whole, people prefer to stay in hotels and caravans, while camping and staying with friends or family have become less popular options. Aside from that, the two most popular options in years past have been staying with friends or family and staying in hotels, with the exception of 1965, when the former was the most popular option.
The number one choice of 55 percent of Americans in 1965 was to stay with friends or family. In the following two years, this percentage dropped to 35 percent and 30 percent. First-year results showed that camping accounted for 15% of the remaining choices. Once it reached 18 percent in 1985, it dropped to 12 percent in 2005 before rising slightly again in 1985.

In contrast, only 16% of people chose to stay in a hotel in the first year given; however, this choice increased significantly to 37% in 1985 and 38% in 2005. Only 10 percent of the total pie chart was made up of caravans in 1985, a decrease from 14 percent in 1965. In 2005, this figure was twice as high as it was in 1985.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-09-12 Drake004 95 view
2022-06-14 Ngoc21 78 view
2022-06-14 Ngoc21 73 view
2022-06-14 Ngoc21 61 view
2022-06-14 Ngoc21 73 view
Essays by user Ngoc21 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 265, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...riends or family and staying in hotels, with the exception of 1965, when the former was the most popu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, while, as to, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48292682927 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23999660066 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551219512195 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8853356511 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155572613376 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075286124052 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600472123356 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122938717545 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721399531988 0.0819641961636 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.