With the advancement in technology, the number of computers being used in the field of education has increased. Some people believe that there will be no role for teachers in the classroom.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
As the technology industry has witnessed dramatic development, it is thought by some that computers will take the place of teachers in the education field. While I agree that computers are taking part in more and more aspects of education, I believe that education still needs human teachers because of their mental support.
Providing learners with personalized learning and more accurate knowledge could be regarded as two major benefits of computer-based learning. Digital learning tools can produce learners with active learning conditions in which they are free to choose the place and time to study, leading to the better acquirement of knowledge as well as academic results. Moreover, while teachers, as humans can make some mistakes during lessons, computers could always impart correct knowledge,
On the other hand, I believe that teachers could never lose their role in the classroom. While learning with the computer, to achieve much success in studying, students need to have great self-discipline, which just a minor number have. Therefore, the promotion and vision of teachers are essential in classes to ensure the effectiveness of the lessons and the academic performance of learners. Moreover, although computers can provide more correct knowledge than teachers, they could not support students’ personal matters. There haven’t been any computers that help students with financial aid, confide with students to reduce their mental problems, or visit their houses to ask about students’ health.
In conclusion, although some people hold the opinion that computers could supply teachers’ place in education, I totally disagree with this statement because of the indispensable human connection with students that only teachers can create.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 480, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s could always impart correct knowledge, On the other hand, I believe that teache...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, so, still, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61797752809 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83152507705 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584269662921 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.8810836988 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.0 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223613534092 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890852552804 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636969889457 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142187427404 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500274044371 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.