Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is undoubtedly that expressing complete honesty to build strong bond with others becomes a prominent factor in a relationship. I, personally, state the same perspective of this phenomenon which will be deliberated more below.
On the one side, open government system concerning on recent problems would induce media to spread overwhelming news and hoaxes, leading to public panic. To illustrate, the delayed response of South Korean government to Fukushima nuclear wastewater may evade the same chaos as Japan, panic buying of sea salt supply. Furthermore, mostly individuals would feel intimidated or offended when they express honesty to others. As opposed to accept one’s experience to seize greater opportunities he earned, others may spread malicious rumours about him deliberately. Thus, those who tell the truth about their journey can undergo great depression.
On the flip side, in terms of national issue, to foster openness strengthens how authority maintain the public trust, especially the transparency of revenue and expenditure of parliament aimed for citizen’s welfare and prosperity. Hence, this will likely increase the country success tackling corruption and bribery scandals such as Denmark and New Zealand implementing high international transparent system. In addition, one of effective preventions against various abuses is disclosing the crime committed by perpetrators. This appears to be the best solution to release psychotrauma, published by Australian government, AIFS, being supportive and reassuring their story helps them to recover better.
In conclusion, in my standpoint, developing trust to keep connecting with people are more crucial. This includes consolidating the stronger national transparency as well as combating the violent assaults. This is as long as the voice of truth is strictly controlled to preclude hoaxes.
- Many companies sponsor sports to advertise their products or service What advantages and disadvantages does this bring for the teams and individuals that these companies sponsor 90
- More and more people are moving away from agricultural background to relocate to cities in order to look for work What will be the consequence of this What solutions can you offer 84
- Some feel that individuals should have the right to strike in all jobs while others feel there are exceptions Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 84
- Plastic bags plastic bottles and plastic packaging are bad for the environment What damage does plastic do to the environment What can be done by governments and individuals to solve this problem 90
- As computers translate quickly and accurately learning foreign languages is a waste of time To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, may, so, then, thus, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79710144928 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11799729993 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.717391304348 0.561755894193 128% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3081504185 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.285714286 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0489942685788 0.244688304435 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0171131900821 0.084324248473 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0248331917971 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0288906795723 0.151304729494 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018480022934 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.04 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, may, so, then, thus, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79710144928 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11799729993 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.717391304348 0.561755894193 128% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3081504185 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.285714286 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0489942685788 0.244688304435 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0171131900821 0.084324248473 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0248331917971 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0288906795723 0.151304729494 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018480022934 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.04 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.