Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development

Essay topics:

Around the world, many adults are working from home, and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

In the epidemic due to Coronavirus, we need to secure ourselves by constraining personal contact. Regarding education, online curricula have been and will be our best solution and likely how we conduct education in the near future, even when the disease vanishes. In my opinion, I partly don't want it becomes the official future education.
It goes without saying that technology's advances assist schools and educational organizations efficiently. It turns highly qualified course into a cheap and global service which is prominently accessible with assistance of internet. Consequently, there is high chance that technology developments would globalize the whole educational system. In that scenario, every student on Earth has access to limitless courses in various fields.
However, the traditional education which is held face-to-face has irreplaceable features that are the disadvantages of distance educational method. For example, the truancy would become rife, it even is happening with high frequent in the online classes. Students without contacting with lecturers and friends have significant likelihood of losing motivation and enthusiasm. In many disciplines such as experiment required subjects like chemistry and physics, the virtual education is certainly not adequate like a fully equipped laboratories. Moreover, according to many reliable articles, in order to improve children's communicative skill, an environment like schools where children can make friends and learn myriad lessons that adults are unable to provide for is helpful for children physically and emotionally.
In conclusion, we should incorporate technology in education to improve efficiency, but education itself should not base on technology totally because the traditional education is irreplaceable, especially in terms of children.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-29 nguyenanh9182 89 view
2023-10-10 Nguyen144202 73 view
2023-08-31 oanh2020 84 view
2023-08-26 maidiem.1508 84 view
2023-08-25 thanhbinh 61 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 36, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the epidemic due to Coronavirus, we need to secure ourselves by constrain...
^^
Line 1, column 290, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...sease vanishes. In my opinion, I partly dont want it becomes the official future edu...
^^^^
Line 1, column 342, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... becomes the official future education. It goes without saying that technologys ...
^^^
Line 4, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eable, especially in terms of children.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.94296577947 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19060121271 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673003802281 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.609750522 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.230769231 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0878943273581 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0285368786657 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.025702195445 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0518610236094 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223220874733 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.17 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.