The best curriculum is not one based on a static body of knowledge, but one which teaches students to cope with change. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The younger generation is the future; therefore, they always obtain the world’s attention in a lot of spheres, especially in education. Some people say that the optimal academic programme should teach students how to adapt to adjustments instead of providing a fundamental source of information. I disagree with this argument, and I will explain the reasons in the following paragraphs.
Traditional education provides children with the necessary information and skills in order to grow up and develop the ability to learn advanced knowledge in later life. First, fundamental information ranging from literate to basic math, science, and biology assist them to integrate more easily with the world. Moreover, in the future, without this knowledge, they cannot apply for higher education, for example, graduated or post-graduated. As a result, they may be unemployed. Secondly, the conventional curriculum at schools also helps children obtain practical skills, such as problem-solving, time-management, and interpersonal skills, that will give them the capacity to overcome difficult situations they may encounter in their lives. Besides, with these skills and knowledge, they will become confident, civilized, and intellectual people.
Admittedly, the world is changing every day; therefore, learning new information and skills is also needed. Computer and technology skills, for example, or basic economics knowledge. However, it is hard to absorb this new knowledge without a basic understanding.
In conclusion, everyone needs static background information because it helps them understand the fundamental rules that govern the planet. Children should learn this information in their curriculum at school before they learn any others.
- The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least150 41
- The three pie charts show different accommodation choices by holidaymakers in the three years 1965 1985 and 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making relevant comparisons 78
- The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992 Summarise the Information by selecting end reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- For school children their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Fossil fuels coal oil and natural gas are the main sources in many countries However in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy wind and solar energy are encouraged Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nowledge without a basic understanding. In conclusion, everyone needs static bac...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.87401574803 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16831060289 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614173228346 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8484841256 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.571428571 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0816782452602 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0280225338941 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0227296909139 0.0667982634062 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0505877519171 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0143174104428 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.47 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.