The best way to learn about other cultures is to work in multinational organizations Do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

The best way to learn about other cultures is to work in multinational organizations. Do you agree or disagree?

It is irrefutable to say that world is full of different cultures and traditions and it is believed that by working in multinational organizations people acquire knowledge about other cultures in the better way. However, i think that it is not the best way because in these places people only focus on their jobs because there are affective methods are available to learn about cultures.

To commence with, there ate many reasons that why people can not learn about other cultures in multinational organizations. Firstly, at every work place employees have to concentrate on their work for the best results and therefore they hardly involve with others. Secondly, in multinational companies only international language is allowed to speak and employees handle the clients in this language as well as speak with other colleagues in office. As a result, they do not get information a out the languages which lead to lack the knowledge of culture.

In addition, in the companies one can not get knowledge about the customs and food of a particular culture background. As these are prohibited in the offices. Apart from it, these companies have also rules and regulations such as wearing uniform therefore people do not learn about the traditional clothes of other cultures. However, best method of learning about other culture is to travel other countries where people get chance to involve with locals, try their food and many more.

To recapitulate, although people from different culture background work together in the multinational organizations but i think it is not a reliable method to learn about other cultures because every company have their own rules and restrictions which unable people to learn other cultures.

Votes
Average: 7.1 (7 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-30 Zahid6400 61 view
2021-09-17 MODI JAGRUT 61 view
2021-03-11 Pamm 71 view
2020-09-10 xa1en 67 view
Essays by user Pamm :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...er cultures in the better way. However, i think that it is not the best way becau...
^
Line 3, column 492, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...s a result, they do not get information a out the languages which lead to lack th...
^
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ood of a particular culture background. As these are prohibited in the offices. Ap...
^^
Line 5, column 333, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the best'.
Suggestion: , the best
...ional clothes of other cultures. However, best method of learning about other culture ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 121, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... in the multinational organizations but i think it is not a reliable method to le...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, apart from, i think, in addition, such as, as a result, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20788530466 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88638862962 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483870967742 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.2673318369 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.090909091 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3636363636 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1818181818 7.06120827912 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382454362672 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148090374963 0.084324248473 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0994245685017 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263780775283 0.151304729494 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499879532886 0.056905535591 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.