The best way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home for work, education or shopping. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Incessant traffic jams and other traffic-related problems have heightened public interest in the topic of how to curb traffic volume. Although some people believe that reducing the need for daily commuting is the best way to do this, my stance is that facilitating public transport is a better solution.
Firstly, reducing the need for people to travel to work, study or shopping purposes would be unworkable. No matter how effectively modern technologies allow us to work, study or carry out online transactions, most of us still prefer face-to-face interactions, perpetuating the need to travel. This can be seen in the way that business people choose to meet up halfway at a cafe, how students prefer to discuss an idea or a lesson at their school campus, or how we enjoy going to shopping malls. Without society still putting a large amount of significance on real-life conversations and interactions, the proposed scheme would not work.
Facilitating public transport appears to be a superior alternative solution. Since means of transport that are not road-based, such as sky trains or subways, are largely underdeveloped in most cities, developing these could help people commute without causing congestion, easing pressure on roads. By developing these, Japan has managed to reduce the amount of traffic significantly, resulting in fewer vehicles on roads. Granted, one might argue that adopting such a method could be expensive, but government subsidies would lower the prices of tickets, which will incentivize people to use public transport and subsequently reduce congestion.
In conclusion, it is futile trying to stop the need for people’s daily commuting, and a better remedy that could be adopted would be to develop public transit systems in order to alleviate traffic.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-10-17 | nhanluu79462 | 78 | view |
2023-05-14 | hieu13092006 | 56 | view |
2023-01-04 | vanphat03 | 80 | view |
2022-12-01 | NSMDeadshot0411 | 78 | view |
2022-07-23 | levanhoan123 | 78 | view |
- Education for young people is important in many countries However some people think that the government should spend more money on the education for the adult population who cannot read and write To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people believe that to protect local culture tourism should be banned in some areas whereas others think that change is inevitable and banning tourism will have no benefits Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Scientists generally agree that the consumption of junk food is detrimental to health Some people believe that the answer to this problem is education Others disagree saying that it will not work Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Education for young people is important in many countries However some people think that the government should spend more money on the education for the adult population who cannot read and write To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The best way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home for work education or shopping To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, so, still, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36042402827 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02792424578 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611307420495 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.7940802924 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.909090909 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7272727273 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248740429852 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0999633592835 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921220816162 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149083656966 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552351638359 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, so, still, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36042402827 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02792424578 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611307420495 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.7940802924 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.909090909 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7272727273 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248740429852 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0999633592835 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921220816162 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149083656966 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552351638359 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.