Some people believe that to protect local culture tourism should be banned in some areas whereas others think that change is inevitable and banning tourism will have no benefits Discuss both views and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people believe that to protect local culture, tourism should be banned in some areas whereas others think that change is inevitable and banning tourism will have no benefits. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Of all the truisms about tourism, perhaps one of the truest is that it empowers people of different cultures to interact, learn, and evolve. However, this has led some to worry about local cultures disappearing as a result of such interaction. My stance is that a ban on tourism would not only yield no benefits but also fail to protect local cultures as a whole.

Granted, one might argue that by banning tourist activities in certain places, the traditions in these areas can be preserved. This is predicated on the assumption that with the presence of foreign travelers, local people may be negatively affected by foreign cultures, ways of life and languages. This means that they might reject their own ways of life and beliefs to adopt more exotic ones, thinking that these are more enlightened and modern. Without such interaction, perhaps they would not compare their traditions and beliefs to others’, hence preserving the culturally unique traditions of their areas.

However, this line of reasoning is not sound because the widespread use of the internet exposes local people to different facets of life. This means that stopping changes is inevitable, and a form of indoctrination would ensue if they are taken away their chances to learn by deliberately stopping them being exposed to foreign beliefs. Consequently, this would result in the loss of critical thinking, causing stultifying effects on the progress of a society. Furthermore, since tourism is a lucrative industry that employs a large number of people, a ban on tourism would result in many job and economic losses.

In conclusion, prohibiting foreign activities is an unwise proposal. This is because it would cause financial hardship for local people whose lives depend on the influx of holidaymakers.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-17 nhanluu79462 78 view
2021-10-10 gianggiangvn 89 view
2021-07-24 bikram12 56 view
2021-07-03 DQDang 89 view
2020-08-26 satyam mangroliya 89 view
Essays by user nhanluu79462 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 526, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...sm is a lucrative industry that employs a large number of people, a ban on tourism would result i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 585, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun job seems to be countable; consider using: 'many jobs'.
Suggestion: many jobs
...eople, a ban on tourism would result in many job and economic losses. In conclusion,...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, in conclusion, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20761245675 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83166782873 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56401384083 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5695906412 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.769230769 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209644524541 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724759529625 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065490014172 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124622510032 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0825804480118 0.056905535591 145% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 526, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...sm is a lucrative industry that employs a large number of people, a ban on tourism would result i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 585, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun job seems to be countable; consider using: 'many jobs'.
Suggestion: many jobs
...eople, a ban on tourism would result in many job and economic losses. In conclusion,...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, in conclusion, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20761245675 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83166782873 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56401384083 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5695906412 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.769230769 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209644524541 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724759529625 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065490014172 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124622510032 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0825804480118 0.056905535591 145% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.