Children nowadays spend a great deal of time watching television. However, television cannot replace the book as a learning tool, which is why children are less well‐educated today. To what extent do you agree with this statement ?
In current world, television being widely used as a supplement for education by students. People believe that spending a lot of time watching television will affect children’s learning and it can never replace book as an education gadget. This essay will discuss why book should not be replaced by television.
First of all, it clear that television should not replace book as learning material owing to the fact that children always misuse it without the supervision of parents. To exemplify, children prefer to watch cartoon programme than educative programme as it is more attractive and interesting. I am convinced children will prefer TV show which is more entertaining than educating.
Moreover, children generally more focus on audio-visual programme, not on learning if they learn through television. However, learning process will become more effective by using book as they can concentrate on the contents of book and lessons it offered with less distraction. Furthermore, television is addictive, and many parents complain that their children spend hours a day in front of television and not willing to focus on their studies. What worst is spending too much of time watching television is detrimental to their health. This also a part of what parents worry for.
To summarize, I strongly agree that book can never be replaced by television as a learning tool. As children do not have strong self-discipline to guarantee them would not misuse the television without accompany of parents. Television is less educative and addictive, so it is not suitable as a main learning tool.
- Should students be allowed to choose which classes they take, or should they be required to take the same classes as everyone else? what are the advantages and disadvantages of each approach to education? 56
- Children nowadays spend a great deal of time watching television However television cannot replace the book as a learning tool which is why children are less well educated today To what extent do you agree with this statement 72
- In the past people lived in one place for a long time but now they can live in many different places what are the reasons Is this a positive or negative development 45
- Some people think technology makes life complex, so we should make life simpler without using technology. Do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 18, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'clears'?
Suggestion: clears
...ed by television. First of all, it clear that television should not replace book...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 572, Rule ID: WORRY_FOR[1]
Message: The verb 'worry' does not normally take the preposition 'for'. Did you mean 'worry about'?
Suggestion: worry about
...ealth. This also a part of what parents worry for. To summarize, I strongly agree th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 98, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...laced by television as a learning tool. As children do not have strong self-discip...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32549019608 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01949579624 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2087327911 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2142857143 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64285714286 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405369021037 0.244688304435 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138092005798 0.084324248473 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520174021118 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245259009951 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350424818922 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.