Children spend too much time watching TV nowadays. What are problems and solutions?
There are various way to entertain in leisure time. Some people indulge in workout. Other take up playing instruments. As I see, most children spend their free time to lie-in and watch TV. It will be a problem if watching TV take so much of their time.
To start with, I will mention some demerits of this problem. Firstly, television can be addictive. There are so many things on TV that kids like: favourite cartoons, shows, etc. And it really hard for them to stop watching, which make them stay up late at night. Secondly, we have already know that it is not good for our health if we spend too much time on digital devices, one of which is TV screen. Staring at screen for hours can affect children’s eyes in a bad way. If your kid is watching TV constantly without giving his eyes any break or if he is watching from a closer distance, he is likely to suffer from eyesight problem. Studies have shown that, children who spend too much time lying and watching TV instead of doing physical activities are more likely to be overweight. Moreover, if parents do not have time to watch TV with their children, they will not know what their children is watching, whether it is suitable or not. As a result, some unsuitable scene, such as violence scene, can build up behavior problems.
However, television still have some merits. Besides unfitting thing, there are so many wonderful things for children to learn. Television provides a window into the world as through media, kids can explore places, animals, or things that they couldn’t see otherwise. Many show deliver humane messages so that children can develop their worldview. Television also encourage children’s imagination and creativity.
In conclusion, I think children should watching TV under parents’ control. Time to watch must be restricted, programs must be chosen. Watch TV with your children and do not allow them to watch in meals. Be their example and reward them for good behavior. It is up to the parents, caregivers, and educators in their lives to ensure that kids’ viewing experiences are enriching and not damaging.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'known'.
Suggestion: known
...ate at night. Secondly, we have already know that it is not good for our health if w...
^^^^
Line 3, column 458, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a bad way" with adverb for "bad"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...en for hours can affect children’s eyes in a bad way. If your kid is watching TV constantly ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 268, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun show seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many shows'.
Suggestion: Many shows
...hings that they couldn’t see otherwise. Many show deliver humane messages so that childre...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 278, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'delivers'.
Suggestion: delivers
... they couldn’t see otherwise. Many show deliver humane messages so that children can de...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, still, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1752.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86666666667 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60448331408 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0721442886 156% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3578454695 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.08 106.682146367 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4 20.7667163134 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361741870768 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951799263875 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107384285461 0.0667982634062 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227127136252 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114262396622 0.056905535591 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.0946893788 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 50.2224549098 148% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 11.3001002004 57% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.37 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 4.0 9.78957915832 41% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.