Discuss some of the arguements for and against the maintenance of the zoos?
Zoos have existed for centuries and remain places where people come to learn about animals life. However, the maintenance of zoos is still a problem for arguments. Personally, I do think both view is reasonable as each has its own merits.
First and foremost, it seems like keeping animals in zoos can save them from extinction and other dangers. For example, zoos are working to save polar bears and tigers from habitat loss, apes and rhinos from poachers, dolphins and whales from hunters, bees and butterflies from population declines, among many other efforts to help other animals. What's more, zoos increase knowledge of animals and conservation efforts. Visitors not only can get chance to see remarkable animals up close but also can learn more about specific individual actions to protect biodiversity. Furthermore, zoos produce helpful scientific research. By study about their behaviour, diet, breeding and genetic, people are more conscious of animals, especially of endangered species.
However, zoo confinement is likely to be a psychologically damaging to animals. Being kept in a tiny cage with poor facilities, lack of freedom, suffer from loneliness, all of that make change in animals behaviours. Especially, it can cause depression in animals, which lead to such actions as eating feces, twitching, rocking back and forth, plucking hair, pacing, vomiting, and self-mutilation, among others. Besides that, animals' physical health may be adversely affected. Animals confined are likely to have shorter life expectancy and less breeding process. Meanwhile, most zoos are treated as recreational facilities. For that reason, some visitors do not always have respect the rules of zoos, or the boundaries that keep them safe from potentially dangerous animals.
As we can see from the previous discussion, zoos are a rather controversial topic. While there are many advantages to zoos, there are also many problems related to those facilities. In my opinion, keeping animals in zoos can be justifiable as long as animals are kept under rather natural conditions and are not caged in pretty confined spaces.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...ny other efforts to help other animals. Whats more, zoos increase knowledge of animal...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, while, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1797.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41265060241 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84749771094 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623493975904 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.0802948877 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5789473684 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4736842105 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149813031004 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054118895242 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652392887842 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104206614172 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533259968103 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.