: Children under 10 years old are not allowed to use smartphone. Do you agree or disagree?
Almost everyone believes that smart phones bring a lot of harm to people, especially children under 10 years old. Many parents keep their children away from smartphones and is that really true or not to do it? I completely oppose the fact that children under 10 years old are not allowed to use smartphones.
Firstly, children will not get lost when they own a smart phone. All of smartphones of brands always set up map and place to find users. Clearly, it is easy for children to use this software by some basically steps. Moreover, directions feature will help them find out the shortest away to come home. Definitely, when children own a smart phone which has modern features, they can easily find out the places where they want to go or the way back home.
Secondly, children also can easily communicate with their relative and friends. Children can make a call for their parents in emergency case. Obviously, children will not contact with their relative if they do not have any phone. For example, on the road, they are hurt or even get accident, so they can call for their parents by the phone; through the smart phone their parents will come with them. What is more, children also can chat with friends after class. In their free time, children also can communicate with other persons to swap their stories.
On the contrary, my opponents might agree that smartphones can impact on a child’s development, so children should not have smartphones. For instance, children used to spend their free time playing outdoors with friends. Now, they just stay at home to use smart phone. However, this is not completely convincing when we look at some reasons. Software about education from smart phone can help children in learning. Clearly, software in smart phone such as Hello English Kid, English Kid App, Monkey Junior software can help them how to read, speak, understand, write, etc. Furthermore, Online classes where children can register to learn. They will be studied with native speaker through smart phone. By the way, they can improve their skills quickly.
In conclusion, smart phone really can help children in direction, communication and learning. However, if children exposure to smartphones too much, bad things will come, so parents should be limited and monitored.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Adilrahi | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | msolanki | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | sepide1367 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | martinestefan | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | kiana | 61 | view |
- Writing an essay compare or contrasting living in a dormitory and living with your family 62
- Write an essay comparing or contrasting two pets 72
- Writing an essay compare or contrasting living in a dormitory and living with your family. 56
- In the past, the main role of teachers was providing information. Today with various sources of information available to students, teachers have no role in modern education. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- It is not necessary for primary school pupils in VN to go to extra class. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, by the way, on the contrary, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 7.85571142285 267% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1918.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99479166667 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50740953841 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518229166667 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0721442886 156% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8768854973 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.72 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.36 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177256908046 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656161770741 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0910869568873 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135485142489 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137346911675 0.056905535591 241% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 50.2224549098 146% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.3001002004 60% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.07 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.58950901804 83% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.