companies should provide sports facilities for local communities. To what extend do you agree?
Providing sports facilities for local communities is a topic that sparks debates. While some argue that it is the responsibility of companies to offer such amenities, others believe it should be the government's role. This essay will discuss both viewpoints and present my own perspective.
On one hand, there are compelling arguments for companies to provide sports facilities. Firstly, companies often possess substantial financial resources, making them capable of investing in infrastructure that benefits the community. By establishing sports facilities, they can contribute to the physical well-being and health of individuals. For example, constructing a community gym or sponsoring sports teams can promote an active lifestyle and combat sedentary habits prevalent in modern society. Moreover, by fostering a sense of community and camaraderie through sports activities, companies can enhance social cohesion and create a positive impact on local residents' lives.
On the other hand, it can be argued that the provision of sports facilities is primarily the responsibility of the government. Governments are elected to serve and prioritize the needs of their citizens. Allocating public funds for constructing and maintaining sports facilities ensures equal access for all members of society, regardless of their financial backgrounds. Additionally, government involvement can lead to better regulation and oversight to ensure the facilities are well-maintained, safe, and inclusive. This broader approach ensures that sports facilities are available to everyone, not just those living in proximity to companies.
In my opinion, while it is commendable for companies to contribute to the community by providing sports facilities, it should not be their sole responsibility. The government should play a significant role in facilitating and supporting the development of such facilities. Collaboration between the private sector and the government can lead to more comprehensive and sustainable solutions. Companies can offer financial support or expertise, while the government ensures equitable access and long-term management.
In conclusion, while companies can make valuable contributions by providing sports facilities, the government should take the lead in this area. A collaborative effort between the private and public sectors is essential to ensure the availability of sports facilities for all members of the local community. By working together, we can create a healthier and more inclusive society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-18 | Huyenlbg87 | 89 | view |
| 2024-05-21 | Sandeep USA | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-11 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-03-11 | MinyiChu | 56 | view |
| 2024-03-04 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Doctors should be responsible for educating their patients about how to improve their health To what extend do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that the experiences children have before they go to school will have the greatest effect on their future life Others argue that experiences gained when they are teenagers have a bigger influence Discuss both views and give your own op 78
- Doctors should be responsible for educating their patients about how to improve their health To what extend do you agree or disagree 73
- Doctors should be responsible for educating their patients about how to improve their health To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 200, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...nities, others believe it should be the governments role. This essay will discuss both view...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2168.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.95604395604 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35417847215 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516483516484 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 682.2 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6383210352 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.4 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307202992933 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103587057072 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0994938866096 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198415649141 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383362242739 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 200, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...nities, others believe it should be the governments role. This essay will discuss both view...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2168.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.95604395604 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35417847215 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516483516484 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 682.2 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6383210352 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.4 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307202992933 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103587057072 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0994938866096 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198415649141 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383362242739 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.